Frequent job changes are a negative factor when evaluating a candidate for a vacant position by the personnel services of most large enterprises. However, excessively long work in one place in the absence of professional growth is also not considered a positive sign.
The question of the frequency of changing the workplace is relevant for any modern person, since it is the work experience and the number of previous employers that are the most significant circumstances in assessing the professional qualities of a candidate for any vacancy. Over time, the average duration of work in one place gradually decreases as the mobility of workers increases. However, every decision to move to another job should be taken with extreme care, as future employers often have to find a convincing explanation for the reasons for such changes.
Features of frequent job changes
The negative attitude of HR services towards those workers who often change their employers is quite understandable and reasonable. In the overwhelming majority of cases, frequent changes in the workplace are explained by the inability to work in a team and interact with colleagues, insufficient qualifications, excessive ambitions, or unwillingness to solve serious professional problems. This behavior of a job seeker can be considered normal only at the initial stages of his career, when he is looking for the most suitable company for him. If the employer shows interest in a candidate who often changes jobs, then you should be ready to explain each case of moving to a new job, the reasons for making the appropriate decisions.
Features of long-term work in one place
Long work is usually considered to be work for one employer, the period of which exceeds five years. Such workers often feel that they have excellent prospects in the labor market, because their resilience, ability to work in one team and to perform their tasks effectively are not in doubt. However, this opinion is valid only if the employee, in the process of long-term work, demonstrates gradual professional growth, which indicates his development.
If an employee performs the duties of an ordinary specialist for one employer for a long time, then this will also raise reasonable doubts among his future potential managers. Among modern personnel officers, the optimal period of work in one place is considered to be a period of 3-5 years, after which the employee is looking for a new job with increased prospects for career growth. Longer employment is only recommended if the current employer provides such growth.
