There are many multidisciplinary expert organizations, both state and non-state forms of ownership. All of them promptly conduct research when they are contacted by organizations, individuals, officials and authorities. The expert opinions as evidence in writing are attached to the case and have legal force. Experts can also assess the validity and objectivity of the opinions of other experts.
Necessary
Unsatisfactory results of the first examination
Instructions
Step 1
To challenge the examination, first of all, you should ask the court to appoint an examination of the report, which is drawn up by an expert, or petition for the appointment of a repeated examination. Then it will be possible to formulate questions for the expert independently, but the payment will be borne by the customer.
Step 2
However, if a dispute arose between the seller and the buyer as a result of the sold goods, which turned out to be unsuitable for use or of poor quality, then the seller is responsible for establishing the fact of the sale of the goods of good quality to the consumer and pays, accordingly, the seller.
Step 3
There are no strict requirements for an application for a petition, therefore, you can apply to the court in writing, setting out the arguments that give grounds for a repetition of the examination or declare orally.
Step 4
If there is no financial and legal dispute in the case, then it will not be possible to send a statement of claim to appeal the result of the examination to the court. This means that if the buyer bought a low-quality product, then first you need to go to court with a statement of claim for the return of funds that paid for the product of inadequate quality. Thus, within the framework of the trial, the result of the examination will be appealed, the proof of which will be the act of research.
Step 5
None of the expertise is obligatory for the court. If the results of the examinations diverge, the court will consider them and evaluate them in aggregate, and may also decide to appoint an additional examination in the case.
Step 6
Usually, during the trial, the court clarifies with the representatives of the second party whether they agree with the choice of the expert organization and if the second party does not agree, another independent examination is carried out. In addition, the court must be convinced that the expert is suitably qualified and can carry out such research.
